Repo Men
Grade: D (Skip it)
Review: A futuristic dystopia where health-care is really out of control. An organ transplantation is reduced to a high interest equity loan; if you don't pay than organ is repossessed and patient dies. Even if we let Goldman manage health-care it is unlikely it would degenerate to this unrealistic scenario. Movie has some gory scenes that serve no purpose. The ending twist is interesting but unfortunately doesn't make up for the unrealistic boring story and poor acting.
Why am I doing this?
I love movies and my former coworkers guilted me in sacrificing some time for people that I've grown to care about.
My time is limited so my reviews are going to be short and to the point.
My time is limited so my reviews are going to be short and to the point.
Why should you care about my movie review?
1. Unlike movie critics I don't get paid by any studio, network or publication. You can expect brutal honesty and integrity.
2. Unlike regular user reviews I tend not to conform even when it is trendy and popular.
3. A motion picture is an art form, but for us mortals it is only two hours of entertainment (not that artistic part is not important).
4. I assure you that if I grade something B- or higher it is worth watching it.
2. Unlike regular user reviews I tend not to conform even when it is trendy and popular.
3. A motion picture is an art form, but for us mortals it is only two hours of entertainment (not that artistic part is not important).
4. I assure you that if I grade something B- or higher it is worth watching it.
Methodology in rating movies
I have a practical approach on rating movies. When I leave the movie theater among other stuff I ask myself:
1. Was I entertained? Was there a point?
2. Was it worth my time (and the overpriced $12.50)?
3. Did it have any memorable dialog?
4. If it was a comedy, how much did I laugh (I am surprised how many times I was told a comedy was good but when I asked were there a lot of laughs I got blank stares).
5. If it was a scary movie, was it really scary.
6. Was it an original idea or at least original approach to some old plot?
There are many other dimensions that I consider but they are all practical with a sole goal of having full confidence and credibility of giving something thumbs-up.
Will this methodology lead to a lot of bad grades?
YES!!! But have you seen how much junk is getting produced.
If you want to save some time and money read my reviews.
1. Was I entertained? Was there a point?
2. Was it worth my time (and the overpriced $12.50)?
3. Did it have any memorable dialog?
4. If it was a comedy, how much did I laugh (I am surprised how many times I was told a comedy was good but when I asked were there a lot of laughs I got blank stares).
5. If it was a scary movie, was it really scary.
6. Was it an original idea or at least original approach to some old plot?
There are many other dimensions that I consider but they are all practical with a sole goal of having full confidence and credibility of giving something thumbs-up.
Will this methodology lead to a lot of bad grades?
YES!!! But have you seen how much junk is getting produced.
If you want to save some time and money read my reviews.
I use yahoo movie grade system
- A+ (Oscar-worthy)
- A (Outstanding)
- A- (Almost perfect)
- B+ (Memorable)
- B (Good)
- B- (Fair) Watch it
- C+ (Flawed but worthy)
- C (Mediocre)
- C- (Disappointing) Rent it
- D+ (Poor effort)
- D (Dreadful)
- D- (Truly awful)
- F (All-time-worst) Skip it
No comments:
Post a Comment